Your NameProfessor NameUnit Name27 Feb 2006Your Title Goes HereThe Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy began after editorial cartoons depicting the   Moslem prophet Muhammad were  create in the  Danish  word of honor Jyllands-Posten on September 30 , 2005 . Danish  Islamic organizations staged protests in response . As the controversy has grown some or all of the cartoons have been reprinted in  newsworthinesss in more than  litre dollar bill other countries , leading to violent protests involving hundreds of deaths ,  in particular in Muslim countriesI feel this is a suitable  recital to explore                                                                                                                                                         and  break up media  parti pris and prejudiced  report , as this is a  super controversial issue  betwixt a Muslim universe sensitive over what they  grok as a   human beingwide assault by the  westbound  globe on their  faith and f   aith , and both liberals and  compensate wingers alike who feel that  freedom of speech is sacred and unassailableAs  much(prenominal) , I have include news coverage from 3 distinct sources - Al-Jazeera , commonly regarded as the media champion of the Arab world BBC ,  one and only(a) of the oldest and respected media institutions in the world and finally , a  ergodic daily news from the  get together States , to compare the news coverage regarding this controversial issue , and to  name any media bias , negative reporting or  aid reportingAl- JazeeraThe link to the  theme can be found in the  Works Cited   plane section of this . We would expect from a preliminary  butt that Al-Jazeera would typically  cheer up the offensive character of the cartoons ,  bring out the  comprehend insensitivities and double standards of the western sandwich media vis-a-vis the cartoons and the Holocaust , as  wellspring as champion the rights of the Muslim worldSurprisingly , this is not the  issue .    The news article quoted seemed to be  itemu!   al rather than  domineering in  temper , quoting a variety of sources and viewpoints from both sides of the  compete , from the Danish media and politicians to Hamas and other Islamic militant groups .

 No  underlying or latent propaganda was detected indeed , negative quotes were  enwrap in double quotes , and attributed to its source . The language  apply was non-inflammatory ,  pore on facts and events , and there was no strong hint of an  perspicacity pieceThe  snuggled the Al-Jazeera piece came to being biased was when it was reporting on the nature of the cartoons (drawings ) at the heart of the controversy . Th   e s used were  dead-on(prenominal) , non-misleading , and mildly strong . However , there was no  notice of the Western world point of view , or of the fact that the combined cartoons at the heart of the controversy which were  pervade by Danish imams contained 3 additional (highly offensive ) drawings not published by the Jyllands-PostenI conclude that the Al-Jazeera piece , when factual in nature and non-inflammatory , seems more interested in presenting the reaction of the Muslim world as well as the threats made by them , when ignoring the Western point of view . There seemed to be an  fantastic  fierceness on the negative incidents such as attacks and boycotts that has occurred as a result of the backlash against the cartoonsBBC...If you want to get a  integral essay, order it on our website: 
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
write my    paper   
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.