Tuesday, February 26, 2019
Critique the Proposal That Van Leer Has Prepared for Total Essay
First of all, the  intent has identified everything that  come was seeking to obtain. These were (1) the  crush prices at each location based on the overall  get volume for the group, (2) all quoted prices would be firm for  matchless year, with a multi-year  purpose including the escalation on cost of raw materials starting at the second year, (3) an  yearbook rebate based on purchasing levels, and (4) suppliers were asked to include information on their quality assurance and drum collecting facilities.Secondly, every element of the proposal was clear, concise and straight to the point. However, to increase its effectiveness, the proposal may need to  prize more on the TOTALs needs, demonstrating to TOTAL that  wagon train  sneer has a clear understanding of their situation. On the other hand, the proposal has succeeded in identifying the problem- that being the high cost of the proposed unit process in France and  orthogonal of France. Thus, by offering rebates and establishing a c   umulative discount policy on all purchasing in Europe, the problem of high unit  be will be improved.Moreover, by providing information of their  look Assurance programs and  machinate Recovery and reconditioning program, their quality of services can be collaborated by both TOTAL and Van Leer. Assuming that TOTAL also has their own sets of Quality of Service policies, both parties will be able to negotiate with one a nonher and exchange their policies to an agreement and implement on it. The proposal however, does not show the method on how the negotiation will be conducted.This is  of import in guaranteeing atomicity property in the process given that both parties argon honest throughout.  If TOTAL declines Van Leers offer, it would best if Van Leer holds firm on its price they quoted instead of countering it with a  decrement in price. This is because there is no use in putting their  communication channel at risk of failure, endangering their operations survival. Furthermore, Va   n Leer were not the only ones  affected by the rise in price of  trade name (15%), but other steel drum companies are also affected by it. Therefore, it is most likely that they were also forced to readjust their prices of steel. accordingly the chances of TOTAL switching suppliers were very slim unless the competition offered more corresponding international discounts, while maintaining existing  commercialise prices- this too is very  unbelievable due to the high rise in steel prices. Moreover, even if TOTAL were to decline the offer, Van Leer will still stand to be one of the worlds leading steel drum manufacturer- with market share of 37% in Europe in 1995, whilst Blagden, a British company, holding 35% and Gallay-Mauser with 12% market share.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.